IT’S Official : Global Warming Alarmists Have No Credibility On Anything Climate Change

IN 2000, climate expert Dr David Viner of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) assured us that…

Snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event” and that
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.”

Dr David VinerSenior scientist, climatic research unit (CRU)

IN 2001 the Climate Crisis Industries’ holy body, the UN IPCC promised us that “milder winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms” due to the activities of mankind…

THEY forecast “warmer winters and fewer cold spells, because of climate change…”


AUSTRALIA’S ‘premier’ scientific body, the (warmist) CSIRO, jumped on the “end of snow” bandwagon in 2003. A report part-funded by the ski industry, found that resorts could lose a quarter of their snow within 15 years

Simulations of future snow conditions in the Australian alpine regions were prepared for the years 2020 and 2050…


The low impact scenario for 2020 has a minor impact on snow conditions. Average season lengths are reduced by around five days. Reductions in peak depths are usually less than 10%, but can be larger at lower sites (e.g. Mt Baw Baw and Wellington High Plains).

The high impact scenario for 2020 leads to reductions of 30-40 days in average season lengths.  At higher sites such as Mt Hotham, this can represent reductions in season duration of about 25%, but at lower sites such as Mt Baw Baw the reduction can be more significant (up to 60%)…

We have very high confidence (at least 95%) that the low impact scenarios will be exceeded and the high impact scenarios will not be exceeded. (Page has been deleted/censored – LOL!)

IN 2014 the global warming theory-obsessed New York Times touted “The End of Snow?”…

The truth is, it is too late for all of that. Greening the ski industry is commendable, but it isn’t nearly enough. Nothing besides a national policy shift on how we create and consume energy will keep our mountains white in the winter — and slow global warming to a safe level. screenhunter_314-feb-07-11-00

This is no longer a scientific debate. It is scientific fact. The greatest fear of most climate scientists is continued complacency that leads to a series of natural climatic feedbacks…”

(Climatism bolds)

The End of Snow? – The New York Times


FAST FORWARD to 2018, where the northern hemisphere has been besieged by one of the harshest winters on record with monumental snowfalls caused by brutally cold Arctic air

This marks the fifth consecutive season that at least 30 inches of snow have fallen in New York City.

There have been only two five-year stretches now where each season featured above average snowfall. This latest five-year stretch and the aforementioned one in the 1880s.
The last five years of winter have been notable for other reasons as well. The largest snowstorm in New York City history — of 27.5 inches — occurred in January 2016. That same season also featured the only subzero temperature since 1994.
In other words, if you’re a New Yorker who thinks that the last few winters have been brutal to some degree, you’re exactly right. If you’re a New Yorker of the belief that winters just don’t live up to the old days, you’re wrong.
NYC hasn’t seen snow like this in 130 years – CNNPolitics
WINTER NH snow extent is trending upwards, not downwards, despite record and rising CO2 emissions and alarmist claims of the “Hottest Year(s) Evah“…


IT is important to remember that no UN IPCC climate model nor expert climate ‘scientist’ nor any of the compliant mainstream media predicted the 2017/18 brutal cold or the record snowfalls seen in New York and snowfalls in all 50 US states in January including, yes, Hawaii and Florida!

UN IPCC models and ‘experts’ all failed to predict the heavy snowfalls seen throughout Europe, including rare falls in Monaco and Rome and heavy snow falling in places as far south as the Sahara desert and Southern regions of Morocco.

IN fact, the UN IPCC predicted the exact opposite and to expect, “warmer winters and fewer cold spells, because of climate change…”


PERHAPS the fake news media and climate ‘scientists’ should adhere to the once-salient advice of the UN IPCC on predictions of climate and climate change…

“The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”


DON’T hold your breath to hear the truth on climate from the fake news media or government funded ‘science’ agencies like NASA, NOAA, BoM or CSIRO et al, or, for the well-orchestrated bombardment of climate alarmism to abate. The powers to be are only interested in stories of global catastrophe in order to push their political agenda and to protect their taxpayer funded grants, their jobs and their precious reputations.



See also :

Related :

Climate Science related :


PLEASE Donate To Climatism To HELP Keep The Good Fight Alive!

(Climate rationalists are still waiting for that “big oil” cheque to arrive in the mail!)

Click link for more info…TQ, Jamie

Donate with PayPal


3 Comments on “IT’S Official : Global Warming Alarmists Have No Credibility On Anything Climate Change”

  1. oldbrew says:

    Man-made global warming – or any warming – is looking shaky or busted, so now it’s ‘extreme weather.’

    Any time there’s anything going on worth a headline, the climate alarmist sirens start blaring.


  2. craigm350 says:

    Reblogged this on WeatherAction News and commented:
    As Piers Corbyn has said;
    “Explain how the extremely wavy south-shifted Jet-stream which gave these cold blasts and which were predicted by solar activity months ahead (see has become something “in line with CO2 driven man-made climate change” whereas the CO2 theory predicts the
    OPPOSITE Jet stream behaviour. The CO2 general warming theory REQUIRES a generally pole-ward shifted (ie larger warm area south of Jet stream), shorter and less-wavy jet-stream which cannot in any way give these type of very wavy jet stream and polar-vortex splitting circulation.
    What we have is the wrong type of extremes for the CO2 “theory”.

    Of course they always fall back into arctic amplification as an excuse, but pray tell why have these extreme events happened before in a cooler world when CO2 was much lower?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.