Climate experts tell us that the US is experiencing a near unprecedented drought, when in fact it is the exact opposite. US drought coverage is near historic lows.
Compare vs. 80 years ago
The area of sea ice on Earth is higher now than it was on this date 35 years ago. This is the exact opposite of what 97% of climate experts predicted. It is also the exact opposite of what 97% of climate experts report is happening.
Excellent PMD historical drought comparison via Steven Goddard (Real Science):
Guest essay by Robert Moore
Is it true that we are in the worst drought in California history? Let’s look at the facts for the last 120 years (1895 to present).
As shown in this chart from the Western Regional Climate Center website (http://www.wrcc.dri.edu) — this is not even the 2nd driest water year for California in the last 120 years.
The driest year was 1924 (9.23 inches, or 40% of normal). The current water year (October 2013 through September 2014) ranks as the 3rd driest in the last 120 years (at 52% of normal).
As for the claim that this is the worst multi-year drought in California history – look at the period of 1910-40 on the WRCC chart. Wow… that was really a dry 30 year period.
View original post 65 more words
Dr. Tim Ball must read via WUWT :
“Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
“There’s nothing we can do to stop it (climate change). Scientifically, it is sheer absurdity to think we can get a nice climate by turning a CO2 adjustment knob.”
Skeptics have done a reasonable job of explaining what and how the IPCC created bad climate science. Now, as more people understand what the skeptics are saying, the question that most skeptics have not, or do not want to address is being asked – why? What is the motive behind corrupting science to such an extent? Some skeptics seem to believe it is just poor quality scientists, who don’t understand physics, but that doesn’t explain the amount, and obviously deliberate nature, of what has been presented to the public. What motive would you give, when asked?
The first step in understanding, is knowledge about how easily large-scale deceptions are achieved. Here is an explanation from one of the best proponents in history.
View original post 1,859 more words
Dr David Viner – Climate expert and Senior scientist of the UK Climatic Research Unit (CRU) March 2000…
Snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event.”
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.”
Autumn snow cover has been steadily increasing towards record levels, and is up more than 30% since 1979. Experts are very careful not to talk about this, because it wrecks their fake little theory which keeps their funding coming in.
NSIDC wants us to believe that satellite measurements began in 1979.
But satellite records go back much further, and showed ice gain in the 12 years prior to 1979. Paul Homewood found this quote from the CRU Director HH Lamb
Kukla & Kukla (1974) report that the area of snow and ice, integrated over the year across the Northern Hemisphere, was 12% more in 1973 than in 1967, when the first satellite surveys were made.
From 1974 to 1979, the IPCC showed another large gain, based on satellite data which NSIDC ignores.
If NSIDC showed the complete satellite data set, people would know that Arctic behavior was cyclical, as we can see in the original GISS temperature graph from Iceland
Hansen of course didn’t want us to know about this cyclical behavior, so he got…
View original post 22 more words
Truth, beauty and laughter.
North Queensland People Power News Service
Just another WordPress.com weblog
Christianity is the root of freedom
What do we really know about science and what is just modern mythology?
How bad knowledge contaminates good data
Climate science is sophistry...i.e., BS.
Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri (be sceptical of the experts)
A fine WordPress.com site
Relevant News in one place
Climate change is primarily a natural phenomenon!
What's hot, what's not
The Definitive Source for Exposing the Global Warming Hoax
A fine WordPress.com site
A journal of diagonal parking in a parallel universe.
Global Warming/Climate Change is not a problem