Arctic Sea Ice Extent At Its Highest Level In Over A Decade

R.I.P The Arctic Canary

Real Climate Science

ScreenHunter_4589 Nov. 15 04.21http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/old_icecover.uk.php

With Antarctic sea ice at a record high, northern hemisphere snow cover near a record high, and Arctic sea ice at a decadal high, government climate experts say that it is the hottest year ever.

View original post


Climate Change Sea Level Rise Extortion

“We live in constant fear of the adverse impacts of climate change. For a coral atoll nation, sea level rise and more severe weather events loom as a growing threat to our entire population. The threat is real and serious, and is of no difference to a slow and insidious form of terrorism against us.
– Saufatu Sopoanga, fmr Prime Minister of Tuvalu, at the 58th Session of the United Nations General Assembly New York, 24th September 2003

No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
.”
– Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment

•••

I am not a scientist, however I can just read a graph.

Apparently graph readers and climate scientists are few and far between within the beautiful islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. So I guess it’s my citizenry duty to ease the fear and alarmism about “Sea Level Rise” for our friends @ClimateKirabati and other island nations living on the edge of sea-level-rise armageddon…

Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at , November 15, 4.00.54 pm

https://twitter.com/ClimateKiribati/status/532631366353944576

Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at , November 15, 4.08.08 pm

Small island nations must unite or drown in rising seas | Climate Change

READING FROM A GRAPH :

Since 1994, there has been no overall sea level rise at PT.La Rue (Seychelles) :

Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at , November 15, 4.15.40 pm

http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/1846.php

Sea Level Rise In Kiribati :

There has been no Sea Level Rise, at all, in Kirabati for over 40 years :

Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at , November 15, 3.58.02 pm

Data and Station Information for CHRISTMAS ISLAND II

The purported plight of Pacific and Indian Ocean Island nations like Kiribati, Tuvalu, Seychelles and the Maldives et al, serve merely as emotional arguments to promote Government climate agenda for carbon (dioxide) taxes and….control, whilst cash-strapped Pacific Island Nations use the associated climate guilt as a vehicle to pursue compensation to be paid by Western nations. Economic outcomes in line with the United Nation’s wealth redistribution agenda.


See Also :

Related :


Why Does The ABC Employ Dr Karl?

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to 
know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” – UN IPCC 
Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itohan award-winning PhD environmental physical
chemist.

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of 
scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” – U.S Government
Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of
NOAA.

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” – Nobel Prize Winner for
Physics, Ivar Giaever.

•••

Karl

via Herald Sun:

The ABC’s “science” guru, Dr Karl , has a severe problem in accepting the world isn’t warming as he insists. Here is just one of several examples I’ve written about before:

What Britain’s warmist Met Office actually said about warming since 1997:

The linear trend from August 1997 … to August 2012 …is about 0.03°C/decade, amounting to a temperature increase of 0.05°C over that period
What ABC science presenter Dr Karl repeatedly claims the Met said:

MET office data of static warming for last 16 years is a misconception? @JWSpry @25outsidefifty Yup, world has warmed 0.3C in last 16 years.

Dr Karl repeats his false claim:

0.3C, as MET suggests.

Reader JW Spry tries again to get ABC science presenter Dr Karl – a denier of the 16-year pause in warming – to correct a blatant error:

spry_thumb

Yet even after being confronted with the evidence of error, Dr Karl refused to correct, acknowledge or apologise.

Totally unembarrassable, Dr Karl was at it again on the Drum yesterday, now claiming a mass beaching of walruses was evidence of global warming. Once again, he was completely wrong – and no one on the panel challenged him.

But when sceptics like me do what I’ve just done here – match warmist claims against facts, predictions against outcomes – and expose Karl-like alarmism, Dr Karl screams it’s a conspiracy. On The Drum yesterday:

I think it’s a disinformation campaign by the big carbon combustion companies.

Once again he was not contradicted.

Yet his conspiracy theory is nuts. In what way has a “carbon combustion company” influenced me when I compare Dr Karl’s crazier claims to the truth? Is Dr Karl claiming I’m using matieral supplied by such a company? That I’m corrupt, being paid by Big Carbon to lie?

Spell it out, Dr Karl. Oh, and please don’t forget to also address the actual errors I have identified in your claims.

Reader James:

On The Drum today I think even Steve Cannane was embarrassed by Dr Karl Kruszelnicki’s insistence that climate scepticism is an organised disinformation campaign by fossil fuel companies.

ExxonMobil is the world’s largest western owned oil company. Here’s what they say about climate change on their web site:

Climate policy…
Keeping in mind the central importance of energy to economies of the world, ExxonMobil believes that it is prudent to develop and implement strategies that address the risks to society associated with increasing GHG emissions.

You will find similar or more strident comments of other oil company websites. Hardly looks like the sort of campaign Dr Karl claims exists.

Why can’t he admit instead that people are able to compare statements and predictions made by alarmists to reality and draw their own conclusions?

A more important question: why does the ABC has a “science” presenter who is so shamelessly alarmist and unapologetically wrong?

The ABC is out of control.


(Dr) Karl Archived :


John Holdren – The Perfect 10

Real Climate Science

Last week, the White House predicted 10 degrees warming in the US by 2100 – based on top line research from John Holdren.

ScreenHunter_10 May. 09 13.20

In 1997, Holdren also predicted ten degrees warming

paintimage5168The Free Lance-Star – Google News Archive Search

Since he made that forecast in 1997, Earth has warmed 0.0 degrees, meaning we only have ten degrees left to go. This is more in line with Holdren’s 1971 forecast for a new ice age.

Global_Ec_title_small (1)Global_Ec_76-7_quote

John Holdren in 1971: “New ice age” likely · zomblog

In order to become the top scientist in the land, you have to demonstrate conclusively that you are both completely incompetent and a total flake.

View original post


An Entire Science Wrecked By Data Tampering

Real Climate Science

In Briffa, 1998 – he reported that an apparent post-1960 divergence between tree ring density (thick solid line) and surface data (thin solid line) was likely due to some unknown anthropogenic effect like CO2 or acid rain.

ScreenHunter_165 Mar. 02 23.27

ScreenHunter_174 Mar. 03 05.09

eas8001.eas.gatech.edu/papers/Briffa_et_al_PTRS_98.pdf

He was correct that it was a Mann-made problem, but it had nothing to do with the trees or the “ecology.” The problem was that the surface data had been altered. The temperature graph below is from the 1975 National Academy of Sciences, and shows a 0.5C drop in temperature after 1940, and a large drop from 1960 to 1965.

ScreenHunter_166 Mar. 02 23.33

The next graph overlays the 1975 temperature data (red) on Briffa’s tree ring data. (Note that the scale on the left of Briffa’s graph is not degrees C.)

ScreenHunter_168 Mar. 02 23.38

Note that there isn’t any post-1960 divergence. The divergence only appeared in later NOAA/NASA data.

In 1978, NOAA was still reporting a 0.5C drop…

View original post 150 more words


Climate Scientists 95% Sure The Science Is Unsettled

Climatism

It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true
.”
– Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace

No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
.”
– Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment

•••

There has been no atmospheric global warming, at all, for 17 years and 5 months, despite 35% of all human CO² emissions, since 1751, emitted over the same period.

No GLOBAL WARMING 17 YEARS 5 MONTHS

Satellites show no global warming for 17 years 5 months | Watts Up With That?

The global warming “pause” has become one of the biggest mysteries in climate science. A thorn in the side of the IPCC and the warmist community who assured us that the atmosphere would warm if ‘business as usual’ greenhouse emissions continued.

They were wrong. And…

View original post 1,130 more words


I’m Asking – He’s Not Answering