NOAA US Temperature Fraud
Posted: December 19, 2015 Filed under: Climate Fraud, Data Tampering, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Gavin Schmidt, Global Temperature, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, NOAA, Obama, Pseudo-Science, Scientific Fraud | Tags: climate, Congress, Cruz, Data Tampering, Dogma, nasa, NOAA 1 CommentTony,
Thanks for another great year of excellent work and in particular getting some serious runs on the board in exposing the NOAA / NASA et al fraud.
Was chuffed for you and your efforts, watching Ted’s senate hearing ‘dogma over data’ and seeing your graphs used and logged as evidence!
Your tireless work makes such a difference and keeps a lot of people sane, confident and happy for our future, amongst so much climate insanity and fraud that abounds.Wishing you and fam a safe and happy Xmas and a brilliant new year!
Future President Ted Cruz recently held a Senate hearing on climate which featured the two graphs below showing the various stages of NOAA’s vandalism of the US temperature record.
The graph on the left was published by NOAA around 1999, and shows about 0.5F data tampering, which flatlined after 1990. All of the adjustments were upwards at that time.
I generated the equivalent graph for 2015, which now shows about 1.5F data tampering – three times as much as they did in 1999. All of the pre-2000 adjustments are now downwards (previously were upwards) indicating that these hacks are simply making it up as they go – and not doing any actual science.
Reported : ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz
Measured : ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz
Next graph shows the 1999 and 2015 versions overlain at the same scale, and normalized to 1910-1920. There has been massive additional tampering, and the post-1990 flatline is now a hockey stick.
View original post 245 more words
NOAA Is Getting Bolder And Bolder With Their Climate Fraud
Posted: December 18, 2015 Filed under: Arctic, Cherry Picking, Climate Fraud, Climate History, Climate History News, Climate science, Fact Check, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, NOAA, Scientific Fraud | Tags: arctic, Cherry Picking, climate fraud, Climate history, Data Fraud, NOAA, Scientific Fraud, Tom Karl Leave a comment“Why doesn’t peer-review catch these blatant errors?”
Further merit to the term “pal-review” which has sadly become common-speak in reference to the corrupt world of anthropogenic climate science.
Check out yesterday’s mind-blowing peer-reviewed Arctic fraud from NOAA’s chief scientist – Rick Spinrad
Arctic air temperatures highest since 1900, global report shows – Telegraph
The US weather Bureau reported exactly the same thing in 1922. Seals disappearing and fish being forced northwards. However, in 1922 the reported warming was much larger than 2.3 degrees.
In 1947, scientists reported 10 degrees Arctic warming, much more than the 2.3 degrees reported by Rick Spinrad.
31 May 1947 – TEMPERATURES RISING IN ARCTIC REGION LOS ANGELES…
Glaciers were disappearing from Alaska to Norway.
18 Feb 1952 – POLAR ICE THAW INCREASING GLACIERS SAID TO [?] M…
The sea ice maximum occurred at the end of March, not February 25 as Spinrad claimed, and extent is the highest since at least 2004, not the “lowest on record”
Satellites show that recent Arctic temperatures peaked…
View original post 219 more words
Top Military Fraudster Admiral Titley
Posted: December 10, 2015 Filed under: Climate Fraud, Climate science, Data Tampering, Fact Check, Global Temperature, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, NOAA, Pseudo-Science, Satellite Data | Tags: Climate Change, Climate Congressional Enquiry, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, NOAA, NOAAgate, Ted Cruz Leave a commentAdmiral Titley can’t see the pause.
He can’t see the pause, because NOAA criminals just made it disappear.
Then he went on to imply that taking Earth’s temperature was simple, sort of like sticking a rectal thermometer in. He forgot to mention that half of the NOAA data is fake.
He also forgot to mention that satellites and balloons show the pause unequivocally.
I give him top prize for climate fraudster of the day.
The robust Pause resists a robust el Niño Still no global warming at all for 18 years 9 months
Posted: December 5, 2015 Filed under: COP21, Fact Check, Failed Climate Models, Global Temperature, Global Warming Stasis, NASA, NOAA, Satellite Data, UAH | Tags: "The Pause", COP21, GISS, Global Warming "Pause", Global Warming Hiatus, nasa, RSS Satellite Data, Satellite Data, UAH satellite data 6 CommentsWith the ever increasing divergence of surface temperatures from satellite ones, and the subsequent divergence of overheated climate models to observed reality, it is worth a background on atmospheric measurement systems from former NASA climate scientist Dr. Roy Spencer, Ph.D. – climatologist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville who he developed the first temperature record based on satellites…
Roy Spencer On Satellite (UAH / RSS) v Surface Temperature Data (NASA GISS) :
I claim 2014 won’t be the warmest global-average year on record.
..if for no other reason than this: thermometers cannot measure global averages — only satellites can. The satellite instruments measure nearly every cubic kilometer – hell, every cubic inch — of the lower atmosphere on a daily basis. You can travel hundreds if not thousands of kilometers without finding a thermometer nearby.
(And even if 2014 or 2015 turns out to be the warmest, this is not a cause for concern…more about that later).
The two main research groups tracking global lower-tropospheric temperatures (our UAH group, and the Remote Sensing Systems [RSS] group) show 2014 lagging significantly behind 2010 and especially 1998:
With only 3 months left in the year, there is no realistic way for 2014 to set a record in the satellite data.
Granted, the satellites are less good at sampling right near the poles, but compared to the very sparse data from the thermometer network we are in fat city coverage-wise with the satellite data.
In my opinion, though, a bigger problem than the spotty sampling of the thermometer data is the endless adjustment game applied to the thermometer data. The thermometer network is made up of a patchwork of non-research quality instruments that were never made to monitor long-term temperature changes to tenths or hundredths of a degree, and the huge data voids around the world are either ignored or in-filled with fictitious data.
Furthermore, land-based thermometers are placed where people live, and people build stuff, often replacing cooling vegetation with manmade structures that cause an artificial warming (urban heat island, UHI) effect right around the thermometer. The data adjustment processes in place cannot reliably remove the UHI effect because it can’t be distinguished from real global warming.
Satellite microwave radiometers, however, are equipped with laboratory-calibrated platinum resistance thermometers, which have demonstrated stability to thousandths of a degree over many years, and which are used to continuously calibrate the satellite instruments once every 8 seconds. The satellite measurements still have residual calibration effects that must be adjusted for, but these are usually on the order of hundredths of a degree, rather than tenths or whole degrees in the case of ground-based thermometers.
And, it is of continuing amusement to us that the global warming skeptic community now tracks the RSS satellite product rather than our UAH dataset. RSS was originally supposed to provide a quality check on our product (a worthy and necessary goal) and was heralded by the global warming alarmist community. But since RSS shows a slight cooling trend since the 1998 super El Nino, and the UAH dataset doesn’t, it is more referenced by the skeptic community now. Too funny.
In the meantime, the alarmists will continue to use the outdated, spotty, and heavily-massaged thermometer data to support their case. For a group that trumpets the high-tech climate modeling effort used to guide energy policy — models which have failed to forecast (or even hindcast!) the lack of warming in recent years — they sure do cling bitterly to whatever will support their case.
As British economist Ronald Coase once said, “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything.”
So, why are the surface thermometer data used to the exclusion of our best technology — satellites — when tracking global temperatures? Because they better support the narrative of a dangerously warming planet.
Except, as the public can tell, the changes in global temperature aren’t even on their radar screen (sorry for the metaphor).via Roy Spencer On Satellite v Surface Temperature Data | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
2015 “Hottest Year Ever” Update :
2015 will be the 3rd Warmest Year in the Satellite Record « Roy Spencer, PhD
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
The Christmas pantomime here in Paris is well int0 its two-week run. The Druids who had hoped that their gibbering incantations might begin to shorten the Pause during the United Necromancers’ pre-solstice prayer-group have been disappointed. Gaia has not heeded them. She continues to show no sign of the “fever” long promised by the Prophet Gore. The robust Pause continues to resist the gathering el Niño. It remains at last month’s record-setting 18 years 9 months (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. The least-squares linear-regression trend on the RSS satellite monthly global mean surface temperature anomaly dataset continues to show no global warming for 18 years 9 months since February 1997, though one-third of all anthropogenic forcings have occurred during the period of the Pause.
The modelers ought to be surprised by the persistence of the Pause. NOAA, with rare honesty, said in its 2008 State of…
View original post 4,467 more words
Twelve Reasons Why The Paris Climate Talks Are A Total Waste
Posted: December 1, 2015 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, COP21, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Govt Climate Agenda, NASA, NOAA, Polar Bears, Religion, UN, UNEP, UNFCCC, Wealth Redistribution | Tags: Climate Change, COP21, Paris, UN, UNEP, wealth redistribution 2 CommentsWarming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to
know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” – UN IPCC
Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical
chemist.
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of
scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” – U.S Government
Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of
NOAA.
“The whole climate change issue is about to fall apart — Heads will roll!” – South African UN Scientist Dr. Will Alexander, April 12, 2009
“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” – Nobel Prize Winner for
Physics, Ivar Giaever.
•••

30 Nov 2015 | Breitbart
Over the next 10 days, 140 world leaders – including Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and David Cameron – will descend on Paris to join 40,000 delegates at the UN’s COP21 climate conference.
Here is why they might just as well not have bothered.
1. There has been no ‘global warming’ since 1997
So, of all the children round the world currently being taught in schools about the perils of man-made global warming, not a single one has lived through a period in which the planet was actually warming.
2. The polar bears are doing just great.
As they have been for the last five decades, during which time their population has increased roughly five-fold. So why does the IUCN still classify them as “vulnerable”? Because the environmentalists needed a cute, fluffy white poster-child for their “the animals are dying and it’s all our fault” campaign, and the snail darter and the California delta smelt just didn’t cut it. So various tame conservation biologists came up with all sorts of nonsense about how polar bear populations were dwindling and how the melting of the ice floes would jeopardize their ability to feed themselves etc. How can you tell a conservation biologist is lying? When his lips move.
3. Antarctica is growing.
According to the greenies, this just wasn’t meant to happen. But it is. Even NASA admits this.
4. The Maldives aren’t sinking
Or, if they are, their government is responding in a very odd way. Just a few years back, they were staging photos of their Cabinet meeting underwater to symbolize how threatened they were by “climate change” – a problem that could only be cured, apparently, with the donation of large sums of guilt money from rich Western industrialized nations. But a few months ago they completed work on their 11th international airport. So that all the climate refugees caused by global warming can escape quickly, presumably.
5. Ocean acidification is a myth
If I were an eco-Nazi I would seriously think about killing myself at this point. Ocean acidification was supposed to be their Siegfried Line – the final line of defense if, as has grown increasingly obvious over the last few years, “anthropogenic global warming” theory proved to be a busted flush. But it turns out that ocean acidification is as big a myth as man-made climate change. a) it’s based on dubious, possibly even fraudulent, research and b) if anyone’s acidifying the ocean it’s those wretched bloody coral reefs…
6. The alarmist climate scientists are talentless low-lives who cannot be trusted
Possibly there are exceptions to this rule, somewhere. But just look at NASA GISS, NOAA and the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia/Hadley Centre at the Met Office – three of the main organizations responsible for maintaining the world’s temperature data sets.
NASA has been caught red handed turning cooling trends into warming trends. NOAA is currently under Congressional investigation for its mendacious, politicised attempts to pretend that the “Pause” in global warming doesn’t exist. The CRU was ground zero of theClimategate scandal. The Met Office is a joke. Yet these shysters have the gall to demand that the world’s leaders take urgent action on the basis of their dodgy data.
7. Winter Is Coming
Sunspot activity is diminishing in a manner worryingly similar to that experienced during the Maunder Minimum (1645 to 1715) when ice fairs were staged on the River Thames and the Dalton Minimum (1790 to 1830) which gave us Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow and the Year Without A Summer. Some scientists are predicting the imminent return of a Little Ice Age.
8. CO2 is greening the planet
The Sahel region in Africa is getting greener and more fertile. This is something we should be celebrating, not trying clumsily and expensively to prevent.
9. There has been no increase in “extreme weather events”.
Who says so? The IPCC in its most recent Assessment Report. Droughts, heatwaves, heavy rain events, cyclones, storms: they just haven’t increased in the alarmists assured us they would.
10. People are losing interest in global warming.
A) they don’t believe it’s a real threat, b) they keep being reminded of things that ARE real threats
11. $1.5 trillion is a lot of money to pay every year for a problem that doesn’t exist
This, according to Climate Change Business Journal, is how much it costs every year to “combat climate change.” $1,500,000,000,000 may not sound like a lot of money when the world’s polar bears, not to mention “the children of the future” are at stake. But you’d be surprised: spend $1,500,000,000,000 here and $1,500,000,000,000 there and pretty soon you’re talking serious money.
12. It will make (almost) no difference
If all the world’s leading nations stick to the carbon-reduction commitments they will make in Paris this week, then they will stave off “global warming” by the end of this century by 0.170 degrees C.
Oh – and that’s the optimistic scenario, calculated by Bjorn Lomborg, assuming that countries like, say, China don’t lie or cheat about how much CO2 they’re burning secretly.
His more pessimistic – ie more realistic – scenario is that the best we can hope for is a reduction in global warming by the end of the century of 0.048 degrees C.
This temperature reduction – five hundredths of one degree – is so small as to be almost immeasurable. But if you want to know what it feels like, Willis Eschenbach has done the calculations. It’s the equivalent of walking five metres higher up a mountain. Or, if you prefer, climbing two flights of stairs.
And there you have it: the lunacy of the Paris climate conference in one sentence: $1.5 trillion every year till the end of the century to effect the equivalent of walking to your bedroom.
Twelve Reasons Why The Paris Climate Talks Are A Total Waste | Breitbart
•••
See also :
COP21 related :
- Paris COP21 : Much that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power | Climatism
- Paris Climate Criminals Ignore Record Arctic Ice Growth | Climatism
- COP21: Public support for tough climate deal ‘declines’ | Climatism
- Another climate scare debunked. Professor urges calm | Climatism
- Biggest Fraud In History – Perpetrated By Tom Karl (NOAA) And Gavin Schmidt (NASA) | Climatism
- MUST READ : Global Warming Insanity On Steroids! | Climatism
UN (Paris COP21) related :
- Shock news : UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity | Climatism
- Shock News : UN Wants To Ban Private Property And Create “Human Habitat Settlement Zones” | Climatism
- UN Climate Chief Says Communism Is Best To Fight Global Warming | Climatism
- Shock news : The UN’s Real Agenda Is A New World Order Under Its Control | Climatism
- “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Climatism
Biggest Fraud In History – Perpetrated By Tom Karl And Gavin Schmidt
Posted: November 26, 2015 Filed under: Climate Fraud, Data Tampering, Eco-Activists, Fact Check, Gavin Schmidt, Govt Climate Agenda, NASA, NOAA, Pseudo-Science, Satellite Data, Scientific Fraud | Tags: climate fraud, COP21, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, Gavin Schmidt, nasa, NOAA, NOAAgate, Road To Paris, Scientific Fraud, Tom Karl 1 CommentThe much more comprehensive and accurate satellite data shows us that the last time there was any ‘global warming’, at all, was when Bill Clinton dumped his own legacy in the White House. “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” – 1998.
Earth’s atmosphere has not warmed for decades, as shown by both satellites and radiosonde data.
cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/temp/angell/global.dat
uahncdc_lt_6.0beta4.txt
RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_Land_And_Sea_v03_3.txt
However, the White House is desperate to create a fake climate legacy, and had their employees at NOAA and NASA tamper with temperature data – so that 100% fraudulent headlines like this could come out ahead of the Paris conference.
Global heat records falling like dominoes as world heads to Paris | National Observer
The only record being broken is the amount of data tampering going on at government agencies.
Until the latest massive fraud push ahead of Paris, NASA and NOAA both made it clear that Earth was not warming significantly this century.
www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/climate-assessment-2008-lo-rez.pdf
Satellite temperatures make it clear that the NASA/NOAA graphs are nonsense.
Here in the US, we have been having progressively less hot weather – with the last three years being among the least…
View original post 66 more words
NOAA’s Fabricated “Record Temperatures”
Posted: November 23, 2015 Filed under: Climate Fraud, Data Tampering, NOAA, Scientific Fraud | Tags: climate, climate fraud, COP21, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, Hottest Month Ever, Hottest Year Ever, NOAA, NOAAgate, Scientific Fraud Leave a commentBy Paul Homewood
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-percentile-mntp/201510.gif
NOAA inform us that last month was another “hottest evah”.
Note how a huge swathe of South America has been labelled as “record warmest”. And what is this based on?
View original post 120 more words






















