Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History

The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations
on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models
.”
– Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true
.”
– Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace

“As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.”

– Michael E. Mann | Climategate Emails

aaa jones

“Kevin and I will keep (skeptic papers) out (of IPCC) somehow – even if we have to redefine what peer-review literature is” – Phil Jones | Climategate Emails

“As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones

•••

If you think that the tampering of the earth’s temperature record, to fit the man-made global warming narrative, is another climate denier conspiracy theory, then read this Climategate email from the UK’s leading climate expert, Phil Jones, to the UK Met Office and officials…

screenhunter_400-feb-09-04-21

via Real Science – Phil Jones Fishing For Excuses To Kill Off Global Cooling.

UPDATE

He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past …

screenhunter_303-feb-07-09-19

They did exactly what Wigley was suggesting, removing more than 0.15 C from 1940′s global temperatures. This tampering is what made the hockey stick possible.

If the present refuses to get warmer, then the past must become cooler …

screenhunter_230-feb-06-05-291

Motherlode Part III | Real Science

•••

UPDATE

MUST SEE Video : Sun news – NASA fudges historical temperature numbers to bolster claim that global warming exists.

Screen Shot 2014-02-13 at , February 13, 9.13.12 pm

NASA funding facts or fiction? : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery

See Also : SUN NEWS EXCLUSIVE : NASA Fudges Historical Temperature Data | Climatism

•••

UPDATE

via Steve Goddard’s Real Science :

NASA is constantly altering their historical data to create the appearance of a non-existent warming trend.

GISS-1981-2002-2014-global

gissus19992014

The NASA graphs are useful for politicians who want to raise taxes, and for insurance companies who want to raise premiums – but are worse than useless for scientists who actually want to understand the climate. They show the exact opposite of what is happening to the climate.

The NASA Temperature Record Is A Farce | Real Science

•••

UPDATE

MUST SEE Climategate Video :

The ‘still’ present Director of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), ‘Scientist’ Phil Jones gives evidence to the UK Parliamentary Enquiry into Climategate 2009 …

“I’ve obviously written some awful emails, and I fully admit that …”

•••

UPDATE (COP21 November 2015)

Biggest Fraud In History – Perpetrated By Tom Karl And Gavin Schmidt

•••

More NASA fraud here:

The Biggest Fraud In Science History http://wp.me/p3Bc8A-2vA via @JWSpry

For Charts and Evidence see Real Science’s ‘Motherlode’ Series :

Climategate Related :

NASA / NOAA / IPCC  Temperature Data Fraud Related :

Climatism Related :

Advertisements

23 Comments on “Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History”

  1. activistposter says:

    Reblogged this on ActivistPoster.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Truth and Unaltered date means EVERYTHING to me. I’m on a quest, “Integrity & Ethics” to be foremost in the minds of everyone. Everything we say/do is a direct result of “Ethics”. I have gotten use to NASA and NOAA falsifying data to aid in a predetermined conclusion, but the straw that broke my back was a Nobel Laureate who falsified data. Who do we believe, trust? I only trust myself! Is it character assassination? No these unethical people assassinated their own character by falsifying data. We are the only country left still debating the Global Warming/Climate Change issue (should tell you something). People corrupted by money, but they were corrupt before the money came along.
      I do my own research with tight guidelines to find what is credible. Is there Global Warming? Yes, see Ph.D. paper from J. Box on Greenland Ice melt. Is a cooling happening? Yes, do your own research on the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic.
      What can YOU do about all these LIES bombarding you from everywhere? Do NOT become a part of it! If you discover a LIE from anyone (even your closest friend) do nothing to support them again. DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM, like voting for a politician who lied to you or watching a media show that has lied to you (the whole Network). The issues of Economy, Jobs, Housing, Student Loans, etc. are all secondary to “Ethics” and could NEVER be actually fixed if no “Ethics” exist to begin with.

      Liked by 1 person

      • spock2009 says:

        Interesting concept. However, it doesn’t seem practical as it seems you might be inadvertently castigating yourself from nearly everything and thus negating yourself from valuable inclusion and input into areas you deem relevant. Also, this self-imposed restriction, because of the actual modus operandi involve would in return restrict your options for clear and necessary insight.

        Like

  2. Mike Mellor says:

    Very cool page, Steven Goddard posts so much that it’s impossible to keep up and impossible to find anything that you need later. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Robert Balic says:

    I was arguing with someone who didn’t believe in the pause because it was only the result of cherry picking the end and start points. I linked to a plot I did of the linear regression over the previous 10/15 years as a function of the end date (year and month). http://s5.postimg.org/gunyes2g7/hadcrutanal1.jpg
    There is something suspicious about the 10 year plot (black). Can I get the data for the old 1981 Hansen plot? I would like to compare it with the data that I used (Hadcrut3 I think) after smoothing out the rate of warming with a moving 10 year average as well as the way I plotted the data.

    Like

  4. patriot93610 says:

    Reblogged this on Chowchilla Patriot and commented:
    Global Warming is a hoax and is only a tool for big government power and control. They also want to create false markets and sell fake goods (carbon credits) a fancy way of wealth redistribution.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Charles says:

    I know where these liers should put their hockey stick.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. […] “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” – Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research “It do…  […]

    Like

  7. songhees says:

    I would like to tell you of my latest book and documentary.
    ‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’.
    My latest documentary and video of my presentation.

    My website is
    Thank you.
    Tim



    http://www.drtimball.com

    Debate between Dr Tim Ball and Elizabeth May
    Scroll down to Ian Jessop part 1
    http://www.cfax1070.com/Podcasts

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Mia says:

    Excellent article, now if we could get this madness stopped.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. We live in the most carbon dioxide-starved era in 600 million years. Plants are literally starving for CO2.

    But the government wants to tax us on CO2 output/footprint. Why? Because the Rothschild bankers who own the politicians want your money and they want to control you, have a reason to monitor you, have a reason to tell you what to do.

    Global cooling and warming chart (4,000 years). (Please note: significant volcanic activity often ushers in ice ages.)

    Liked by 1 person

  10. J D Hereford says:

    Just a thought plants starving no plants no food for people so Soylent Green well, be the answer for those with power and control….this will be done to us by taxation ….thus we will give them our money work till we die at a young age….and thus the world will be owned by the few million left with power and money in a couple of generations give or take …..it’s a mess hope you can win I’ll be long gone….but at least in Canada you’ll be able to recreate!

    Like

  11. harleyrider1978 says:

    the other great fraud

    OSHA also took on the passive smoking fraud and this is what came of it:

    Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence: Third Edition

    This sorta says it all

    These limits generally are based on assessments of health risk and calculations of concentrations that are associated with what the regulators believe to be negligibly small risks. The calculations are made after first identifying the total dose of a chemical that is safe (poses a negligible risk) and then determining the concentration of that chemical in the medium of concern that should not be exceeded if exposed individuals (typically those at the high end of media contact) are not to incur a dose greater than the safe one.

    So OSHA standards are what is the guideline for what is acceptable ”SAFE LEVELS”

    OSHA SAFE LEVELS

    All this is in a small sealed room 9×20 and must occur in ONE HOUR.

    For Benzo[a]pyrene, 222,000 cigarettes.

    “For Acetone, 118,000 cigarettes.

    “Toluene would require 50,000 packs of simultaneously smoldering cigarettes.

    Acetaldehyde or Hydrazine, more than 14,000 smokers would need to light up.

    “For Hydroquinone, “only” 1250 cigarettes.

    For arsenic 2 million 500,000 smokers at one time.

    The same number of cigarettes required for the other so called chemicals in shs/ets will have the same outcomes.

    So, OSHA finally makes a statement on shs/ets :

    Field studies of environmental tobacco smoke indicate that under normal conditions, the components in tobacco smoke are diluted below existing Permissible Exposure Levels (PELS.) as referenced in the Air Contaminant Standard (29 CFR 1910.1000)…It would be very rare to find a workplace with so much smoking that any individual PEL would be exceeded.” -Letter From Greg Watchman, Acting Sec’y, OSHA.

    Why are their any smoking bans at all they have absolutely no validity to the courts or to science!

    Like

  12. Denis Rancourt says:

    This 2014 article and its updates is superb!

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s