GLOBAL WARMING Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History
Posted: February 9, 2014 Filed under: Climate Change, Climate Fraud, Climate science, Climategate, Climatism, Data Tampering, Empirical Evidence, Environmentalists, Fact Check, Global Temperature, Global Warming, Government Grants/Funding, Green Agenda, Hockey Stick, ORIGINS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM, Propaganda, Pseudo-Science, Settled Science | Tags: Climategate, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, GISS, HadCRUT, nature, Phil Jones, Scientific Fraud, UK Met Office 35 Comments“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations
on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”
– Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true.”
– Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace
“As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.”
– Michael E. Mann | Climategate Emails
“Kevin and I will keep (skeptic papers) out (of IPCC) somehow – even if we have to redefine what peer-review literature is” – Phil Jones | Climategate Emails
“As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones
•••
If you think that the tampering of the earth’s temperature record, to fit the man-made global warming narrative, is another climate denier conspiracy theory, then read this Climategate email from the UK’s leading climate expert, Phil Jones, to the UK Met Office and officials…
via Real Science – Phil Jones Fishing For Excuses To Kill Off Global Cooling.
UPDATE
He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past …
They did exactly what Wigley was suggesting, removing more than 0.15 C from 1940′s global temperatures. This tampering is what made the hockey stick possible.
If the present refuses to get warmer, then the past must become cooler …
Motherlode Part III | Real Science
•••
UPDATE
MUST SEE Video : Sun news – NASA fudges historical temperature numbers to bolster claim that global warming exists.
NASA funding facts or fiction? : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery
See Also : SUN NEWS EXCLUSIVE : NASA Fudges Historical Temperature Data | Climatism
•••
UPDATE
via Steve Goddard’s Real Science :
NASA is constantly altering their historical data to create the appearance of a non-existent warming trend.
The NASA graphs are useful for politicians who want to raise taxes, and for insurance companies who want to raise premiums – but are worse than useless for scientists who actually want to understand the climate. They show the exact opposite of what is happening to the climate.
The NASA Temperature Record Is A Farce | Real Science
•••
UPDATE
MUST SEE Climategate Video :
The ‘still’ present Director of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), ‘Scientist’ Phil Jones gives evidence to the UK Parliamentary Enquiry into Climategate 2009 …
“I’ve obviously written some awful emails, and I fully admit that …”
•••
UPDATE (COP21 November 2015)
Biggest Fraud In History – Perpetrated By Tom Karl And Gavin Schmidt
•••
More NASA fraud here:
The Biggest Fraud In Science History http://wp.me/p3Bc8A-2vA via @JWSpry
For Charts and Evidence see Real Science’s ‘Motherlode’ Series :
- Just Hit The NOAA Motherlode | Real Science
- Hit The Motherlode – Part II | Real Science
- Motherlode Part III | Real Science
Climategate Related :
- The Worst Scientific Scandal Of Our Generation | Climatism
- ‘Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life’ | Climatism
- Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation – Telegraph
- Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’? – Telegraph Blogs
- Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995 | Mail Online
- MUST READ : Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review | Fred Pearce
- The Climategate Chronicle: How the Science of Global Warming Was Compromised – SPIEGEL ONLINE
- IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud – The New American
- Climategate 3.0: FOIA – The Man Who Saved The World – Telegraph Blogs
- The CRU Mails
- Tom Nelson: 50+ Michael Mann ClimateGate emails
- Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995 | Mail Online
- But I thought the ‘science was settled’ | Las Vegas Review-Journal
- The Game Is Over – Referee Blew The Whistle – Now They Want To Change The Rules | Climatism
NASA / NOAA / IPCC Temperature Data Fraud Related :
- Another View Of NASA Temperature Data Tampering | Climatism
- Why Is The Post 1940 Data Tampering So Important? | Real Science
- Shock News : UN IPCC Rewrote Temperature History To Suit Their Political Agenda | Climatism
- NASA Has Erased Almost The Entire Global Cooling Scare | Climatism
- Shock News : “U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming” | Climatism
- NASA’s Quest To Erase The Warm 1930′s | Climatism
- NASA and Hansen doctored US temperature graphs..“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.” | Climatism
- NASA’s James Hansen in handcuffs again : Nature News Blog
- The Very High Price Of NOAA/NASA Data Tampering | Real Science
- Different Ways Of Viewing How They Hide The Decline | Real Science
Climatism Related :
- Establishing Propaganda Is Vital For Climate Action | Climatism
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago | Climatism
- The Missing Hot Spot | Climatism
- Former NASA Scientists Reject Global Warming Crisis | Climatism
- “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Climatism
- Driessen : A Climate of Fear, Cash and Correctitude | Climatism
- Global Warming Was Never About Science. It Was Always About Power And Money | Cimatism
Reblogged this on ActivistPoster.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Truth and Unaltered date means EVERYTHING to me. I’m on a quest, “Integrity & Ethics” to be foremost in the minds of everyone. Everything we say/do is a direct result of “Ethics”. I have gotten use to NASA and NOAA falsifying data to aid in a predetermined conclusion, but the straw that broke my back was a Nobel Laureate who falsified data. Who do we believe, trust? I only trust myself! Is it character assassination? No these unethical people assassinated their own character by falsifying data. We are the only country left still debating the Global Warming/Climate Change issue (should tell you something). People corrupted by money, but they were corrupt before the money came along.
I do my own research with tight guidelines to find what is credible. Is there Global Warming? Yes, see Ph.D. paper from J. Box on Greenland Ice melt. Is a cooling happening? Yes, do your own research on the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic.
What can YOU do about all these LIES bombarding you from everywhere? Do NOT become a part of it! If you discover a LIE from anyone (even your closest friend) do nothing to support them again. DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM, like voting for a politician who lied to you or watching a media show that has lied to you (the whole Network). The issues of Economy, Jobs, Housing, Student Loans, etc. are all secondary to “Ethics” and could NEVER be actually fixed if no “Ethics” exist to begin with.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting concept. However, it doesn’t seem practical as it seems you might be inadvertently castigating yourself from nearly everything and thus negating yourself from valuable inclusion and input into areas you deem relevant. Also, this self-imposed restriction, because of the actual modus operandi involve would in return restrict your options for clear and necessary insight.
LikeLike
http://nollyprott.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/green-holocaust-tidied-up-after-first-publication-june-2012/
LikeLike
Very cool page, Steven Goddard posts so much that it’s impossible to keep up and impossible to find anything that you need later. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was arguing with someone who didn’t believe in the pause because it was only the result of cherry picking the end and start points. I linked to a plot I did of the linear regression over the previous 10/15 years as a function of the end date (year and month). http://s5.postimg.org/gunyes2g7/hadcrutanal1.jpg
There is something suspicious about the 10 year plot (black). Can I get the data for the old 1981 Hansen plot? I would like to compare it with the data that I used (Hadcrut3 I think) after smoothing out the rate of warming with a moving 10 year average as well as the way I plotted the data.
LikeLike
No original data for Hansen plot. Only original surface temp graphs published by NASA in 1981: http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
They match very closely the 1975 Academy of Sciences graph:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/nasanoaa-have-erased-the-unanimous-cooling-consensus-of-1961/
Every major climate organisation endorsed the 1970’s global cooling scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA – as did the CIA
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/1970s-ice-age-scare/
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Chowchilla Patriot and commented:
Global Warming is a hoax and is only a tool for big government power and control. They also want to create false markets and sell fake goods (carbon credits) a fancy way of wealth redistribution.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Superb! Good find.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Lie about how the climate was…..bad’.
Gold.
LikeLike
I know where these liers should put their hockey stick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Climatism.
LikeLike
[…] CLIMATISM […]
LikeLike
[…] “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” – Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research “It do… […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Real News Australia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would like to tell you of my latest book and documentary.
‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’.
My latest documentary and video of my presentation.
My website is
Thank you.
Tim
http://www.drtimball.com
Debate between Dr Tim Ball and Elizabeth May
Scroll down to Ian Jessop part 1
http://www.cfax1070.com/Podcasts
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent article, now if we could get this madness stopped.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We live in the most carbon dioxide-starved era in 600 million years. Plants are literally starving for CO2.
But the government wants to tax us on CO2 output/footprint. Why? Because the Rothschild bankers who own the politicians want your money and they want to control you, have a reason to monitor you, have a reason to tell you what to do.
Global cooling and warming chart (4,000 years). (Please note: significant volcanic activity often ushers in ice ages.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just a thought plants starving no plants no food for people so Soylent Green well, be the answer for those with power and control….this will be done to us by taxation ….thus we will give them our money work till we die at a young age….and thus the world will be owned by the few million left with power and money in a couple of generations give or take …..it’s a mess hope you can win I’ll be long gone….but at least in Canada you’ll be able to recreate!
LikeLike
the other great fraud
OSHA also took on the passive smoking fraud and this is what came of it:
Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence: Third Edition
This sorta says it all
These limits generally are based on assessments of health risk and calculations of concentrations that are associated with what the regulators believe to be negligibly small risks. The calculations are made after first identifying the total dose of a chemical that is safe (poses a negligible risk) and then determining the concentration of that chemical in the medium of concern that should not be exceeded if exposed individuals (typically those at the high end of media contact) are not to incur a dose greater than the safe one.
So OSHA standards are what is the guideline for what is acceptable ”SAFE LEVELS”
OSHA SAFE LEVELS
All this is in a small sealed room 9×20 and must occur in ONE HOUR.
For Benzo[a]pyrene, 222,000 cigarettes.
“For Acetone, 118,000 cigarettes.
“Toluene would require 50,000 packs of simultaneously smoldering cigarettes.
Acetaldehyde or Hydrazine, more than 14,000 smokers would need to light up.
“For Hydroquinone, “only” 1250 cigarettes.
For arsenic 2 million 500,000 smokers at one time.
The same number of cigarettes required for the other so called chemicals in shs/ets will have the same outcomes.
So, OSHA finally makes a statement on shs/ets :
Field studies of environmental tobacco smoke indicate that under normal conditions, the components in tobacco smoke are diluted below existing Permissible Exposure Levels (PELS.) as referenced in the Air Contaminant Standard (29 CFR 1910.1000)…It would be very rare to find a workplace with so much smoking that any individual PEL would be exceeded.” -Letter From Greg Watchman, Acting Sec’y, OSHA.
Why are their any smoking bans at all they have absolutely no validity to the courts or to science!
LikeLike
This 2014 article and its updates is superb!
LikeLike
[…] Jamie Spry, Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History […]
LikeLike
[…] Jamie Spry, Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History […]
LikeLike
[…] https://climatism.blog/2014/02/09/global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientifi… […]
LikeLike
[…] “Come sai, non sono politico. Semmai, mi piacerebbe vedere accadere i cambiamenti climatici, quindi la scienza potrebbe essere dimostrata esatta, indipendentemente dalle conseguenze. Questo non è politico, è egoistico.”- Phil Jones (Uni East Anglia CRU Head) […]
LikeLike
[…] “As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones (Uni East Anglia CRU Head) […]
LikeLike
[…] https://climatism.blog/2014/02/09/global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientifi… ( englische Seite ) […]
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Climate- Science.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] “As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones (Uni East Anglia CRU Head) […]
LikeLike
[…] “As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones (Uni East Anglia CRU Head) […]
LikeLike
[…] Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History | Climatism […]
LikeLike
[…] Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History | Climatism […]
LikeLike
[…] Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History | Climatism […]
LikeLike