Posted: May 31, 2017 Filed under: Climate Change, Climatism, UN, UNEP, UNFCCC | Tags: climate, nature, Paris Climate Accord, Paris Climate Treaty, Pruitt, Sanity, Trump
SANITY prevails. The world will be a far better place for humans and for nature…
Donald Trump to pull out of Paris climate deal – reports
President Trump has reportedly decided to pull out of the Paris climate change agreement.
According to the news website Axios, two sources close to the Trump Administration said the president has already started consulting on the exit process with senior officials.
The move would strike a massive blow to the legacy of his successor, President Obama, who viewed tackling climate change as a top priority and considered the agreement to be among his greatest achievements.
Border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic: Guess which country contains eco-criminals that can afford to use fossil fuels, and which country contains nature-lovers who are dependent on natural renewable organic biomass for energy?
Posted: May 18, 2017 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmist Predictions, CO2, CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Fossil Fuels, Science | Tags: carbon, carbon dioxide, climate, Climate Change, Climate science, CO2, CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), deserts, Earth, forestry, greening, nature
“[Since] the late 1970s. The vast majority of the globe’s vegetated area is greening, with 25-50% of that area showing a statistically significant change, while only 4% of the vegetated area is significantly browning…”
“Carbon Pollution” (aka Carbon Dioxide) not so “dirty” after all!
Watts Up With That?
Guest essay by Dr. Patrick J. Michaels
It’s hard to say how many punny posts we came up with using those words when Carol Browner was Bill Clinton’s EPA Administrator, but here we use it in the context of a recent Science paper by J-F. Busteri and 30 named coauthors assisted by 239 volunteers. It found, looking at global drylands (about 40% of land areas fall into this category), that we had undercounted global forest cover by a whopping “at least 9%”.
239 people were required to examine over 210,000 0.5 hectare (1.2 acre) sample plots in GoogleEarth, and classify the cover as open or forested. Thing of being condemned to looking at that many satellite views of real estate. Anyway, Here’s the resultant cool map:
This has been the subject of a jillion recent stories, blog posts, tweets and whatever concerning Bastin et al. So let’s add a bit…
View original post 299 more words
Posted: May 15, 2017 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Dud predictions, Fact Check, Fossil Fuels | Tags: carbon dioxide emissions, climate, Climate Change, CO2, CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Earth, Forests, Fossil Fuels, Global Warming Scam, nature, science, Science and Environment
SO, “Carbon Dioxide” is not the evil “pollutant” hysterically demonised by the climate cabal and even enshrined in law, as a “pollutant”, by Obama’s EPA!
The extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, whether produced by humans or nature, is actually growing Earths forests! Shock news.
Another reason other than “carbon pollution (sic)” promoting forest growth, would be the advancements in energy technology, in particular the burning of efficient and energy dense ‘fossil fuels’…
When we’re burning fossil fuels, it means we’re not burning something else and cutting down forests.
The more we burn fossil fuels, the more we can produce fertiliser. That means we use less land to grow food, so we can spare land for forests. So there is net forest increase, particularly in America. New England used to be 70% farmland, it’s now 70% forest. Countries like Bangladesh are growing more forest.
The best example of this is the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Haiti is almost 99% deforested, as they rely totally on wood for domestic and industrial fuel. On the other side, the forests of the fossil fuel burning, eco-terrorists – the Dominican Republic, remain lush and green…
A new satellite that measures greening of the earth has found that about 20% is getting greener. So the rain forests and forests of the world are getting greener from burning CO2. That happens to be a very unwelcome message for the environmental movement, but it happens to be true.
We’ve spent so long demonising fossil fuels, without objectively assessing the enormous benefits they provide, both for the environment and for the health and wellbeing of society in general.
The cheap, reliable nature of fossil fuels even made it possible to end slavery! Because we use machines instead of people. You either have cheap labour or cheap energy.
Moral of the story, THE greatest threat to the environment is not affluence, it’s poverty…
A new survey using high-definition satellite images has found 378 million additional hectares of forest around the globe—it’s as if all of Earth’s forests just grew by 9%.
(The hectare is an SI accepted metric system unit of area equal to 100 ares (10,000 m²) and primarily used in the measurement of land. An acre is about 0.4047 hectare and one hectare contains about 2.47 acres. I don’t do metric, and assume that some of you don’t either. You can also think of it as an area of forest equal to sixty percent of the size of Australia, if that helps)
“The forests have been identified
in drylands in the Sahara desert, around the Mediterranean, southern Africa, central India, coastal Australia, western South America, north-east Brazil, northern Columbia and Venezuela and northern parts of Canada and Russia.”
*The image is of coastal Australia.
View original post
Posted: April 17, 2016 Filed under: Fact Check, Failed Green Schemes, Green Agenda, Green Energy, Renewables, Unreliables, Wind Farms | Tags: nature, unreliables, wind
Industrial Wind Turbines do tend to enhance the natural beauty wherever installed.
If greens love nature, why aren’t they more concerned about carpeting pristine landscapes with industrial wind turbines?
• How Green Is My Industrial Wind Turbine?
Posted: February 9, 2014 Filed under: Climate Change, Climate Fraud, Climate science, Climategate, Climatism, Data Tampering, Empirical Evidence, Environmentalists, Fact Check, Global Temperature, Global Warming, Government Grants/Funding, Green Agenda, Hockey Stick, Propaganda, Pseudo-Science, Settled Science | Tags: Climategate, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, GISS, HadCRUT, nature, Phil Jones, Scientific Fraud, UK Met Office
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations
on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”
– Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true.”
– Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace
“As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.”
– Michael E. Mann | Climategate Emails
“Kevin and I will keep (skeptic papers) out (of IPCC) somehow – even if we have to redefine what peer-review literature is” – Phil Jones | Climategate Emails
“As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones
If you think that the tampering of the earth’s temperature record, to fit the man-made global warming narrative, is another climate denier conspiracy theory, then read this Climategate email from the UK’s leading climate expert, Phil Jones, to the UK Met Office and officials…
via Real Science – Phil Jones Fishing For Excuses To Kill Off Global Cooling.
He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past …
They did exactly what Wigley was suggesting, removing more than 0.15 C from 1940′s global temperatures. This tampering is what made the hockey stick possible.
If the present refuses to get warmer, then the past must become cooler …
Motherlode Part III | Real Science
MUST SEE Video : Sun news – NASA fudges historical temperature numbers to bolster claim that global warming exists.
NASA funding facts or fiction? : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery
See Also : SUN NEWS EXCLUSIVE : NASA Fudges Historical Temperature Data | Climatism
via Steve Goddard’s Real Science :
NASA is constantly altering their historical data to create the appearance of a non-existent warming trend.
The NASA graphs are useful for politicians who want to raise taxes, and for insurance companies who want to raise premiums – but are worse than useless for scientists who actually want to understand the climate. They show the exact opposite of what is happening to the climate.
The NASA Temperature Record Is A Farce | Real Science
MUST SEE Climategate Video :
The ‘still’ present Director of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), ‘Scientist’ Phil Jones gives evidence to the UK Parliamentary Enquiry into Climategate 2009 …
“I’ve obviously written some awful emails, and I fully admit that …”
UPDATE (COP21 November 2015)
More NASA fraud here:
The Biggest Fraud In Science History http://wp.me/p3Bc8A-2vA via @JWSpry
For Charts and Evidence see Real Science’s ‘Motherlode’ Series :
Climategate Related :
NASA / NOAA / IPCC Temperature Data Fraud Related :
Climatism Related :