MAINSTREAM Media Credibility Is Critically Vulnerable To Junk Science And Climate AlarmismPosted: April 13, 2018 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmism uncovered, Alarmist media, Climatism, Empirical Evidence, Fake News, Green Agenda, NOAA, Oceans, Pacific Island Nations, Propaganda, Sea Level Rise | Tags: Activist Media, Alarmism, Alarmist Media, Chile, climate activism, Climate Change, Easter Island, Erosion, Fake News, Global Warming, Josh Haner, Mainstream media, Media Watch, nature, Nicholas Casey, NOAA, Oceans, Omission Bias, propaganda, PSMSL, science, sea level rise, The New York Times Leave a comment
NICKNAMED “The Gray Lady“, The New York Times has long been regarded within the industry as a national “newspaper of record”.
IN March the paper launched a series called Warming Planet, Vanishing Heritage which examines “how climate change is erasing cultural identity around the world.” The series based on a UN “World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate“ report, designed to push the fashionable theme that your lifestyle is causing imminent danger to ancient monuments by dangerous sea-level rise and other climatic horrors.
The Guardian’s “100 Months To Save The World” – Part IIPosted: October 9, 2016 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmist media, Uncategorized | Tags: Alarmism, Climate Change, Debunked, Global Warming Scam, Media Watch, Scare Mongering, The Guardian Leave a comment
Detailed demolition of the Guardian’s alarmist propaganda piece 8 years ago, “100 Months To Save The World” ….
By Paul Homewood
According to the Guardian’s Andrew Simms, we are two months away from reaching a tipping point for the beginnings of runaway climate change.
So, how much has the world’s climate changed since 2008?
View original post 167 more words
The Guardian’s ‘100 months to save the planet’ was always just a fantasyPosted: October 9, 2016 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmist media, Uncategorized | Tags: Alarmism, Alarmism debunked, Climate Change, Media Watch, The Guardian Leave a comment
Superb example of climate alarmism in action, debunked by ‘inconvenient’ real-world data, across all the popular metrics favoured by alarmists.
Nice work Paul and Mr Booker.
By Paul Homewood
Booker follows up on my post last week:
View original post 704 more words