COVID-19 : A Prelude To Life Under The ‘Net Zero 2050’ PolicyPosted: March 12, 2020 | Author: Jamie Spry | Filed under: Agenda 21, Carbon Dioxide, Climate Change, Climate Crisis, Climate Emergency, Climatism, CO2, Communism, Coronavirus, Fact Check, Fossil Fuels, Green Agenda, Socialism | Tags: Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Carbon Dioxide, carbon dioxide emissions, Climate Change, Climate Crisis, Climate Emergency, Climatism, CO2, Communism, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Global Warming, Greta Thunberg, Net Zero 2050, Socialism, UN |6 Comments
“Action must be powerful and wide-ranging.
After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment.
It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will.
Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it.
We need to dismantle them all.”
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we
are setting ourselves the task of intentionally,
within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model
that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”
–– Christiana Figueres (Fmr UNFCCC chief)
UN Climate Chief Says Communism Is Best To Fight Global Warming
WHAT an Orwellian world we inhabit, in this the 21st Century. The age of social media and the twenty four hour news cycle where the race to the top is defined by who is the most outraged, the most aggrieved. Where personal gain is measured by entitlement. Where online ‘likes’ outweigh offline friendships, and where Western politicians take their scientific advice from a 17-year-old child-activist diagnosed with Asperger syndrome, obsessive–compulsive disorder, and selective mutism.
THIS is the age of morality, where it’s more important to signal virtue than sense and reason.
PERHAPS the greatest and most dangerous example of virtue-signalling in recent years has been the frenzied push by eco-activists and their mainstream media acolytes for “Net Zero CO₂ Emissions By 2050” in direct response to GretaThunberg™️‘s “Climate Crisis” palaver.
BUT, what’s the cost? The most vocal will not tell you, perhaps because they don’t even know or simply haven’t weighed up the social and economic consequences of the other side of their zero-emissions utopia.
CFACT contributor Ronald Stein expertly lays out the not-so-pretty side of a #NetZero2050 future with the Coronavirus parallel giving pause for zero emissions zealots to take stock of a Net-Zero future and evaluate what their lives may look like outside of virtue-signalling and panic.
Social Changes With COVID-19 Are A Prelude To Life With Less Fossil Fuels
Posted on Thu 03/12/2020 by PA Pundits – International
By Ronald Stein ~
While the world is feverishly trying to reduce emissions from fossil fuel usage, we get hit with the horrific contagious Coronavirus COVID-19. We’ve seen extensive self-imposed social adjustments to transportation that are very similar to what will be required to live with less fossil fuels in the future.
We’ve seen a serious reduction in the usage of the transportation infrastructures of airlines, cruise ships, as well as automobiles, trucks and their impact on the leisure and entertainment industries, all to avoid crowds.
Before fossil fuels and the thousands of products made from petroleum derivatives, and electricity that followed, the world was a zero-sum snake pit. One that was at war against one another scrounging for food, water, and shelter. In the 1800’s most people never traveled 100-200 miles from where they were born. Life expectancy throughout Europe hovered between 20 and 30 years of age.
The social lifestyles before 1900 had no such transportation choices, as they had no autos, planes, or cruise ships for transportation. The inventions of the automobile, airplane, and the use of petroleum in the early 1900’s led us into the Industrial Revolution. Crude oil, natural gas, and coal changed – for the better – the lifestyles of every person living in developed countries such as, the U.S., Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Australia.
We would not be able to “make products and move things” if not for the thousands of products from petroleum derivatives that get manufactured from crude oil that wind turbines and solar panels cannot manufacture.
Economies around the world, and all the infrastructures are increasing their demand and usage each year of those energy sources from deep earth minerals/fuels to make thousands of products, inclusive of but not limited to:
Medications and medical equipment for cures for most diseases
Electronics for worldwide communications
Fertilizers to help agriculture feed the world
Asphalt for all the roads
Tires for all vehicles
Steel for every building in the world
Wire for the worldwide electrical grid
Today, the airlines that did not exist before 1900, transported more than 4.1 billion passengers in 2017 around the world and projections are 7.8 billion airline passengers by 2036. Cruise ships which also did not exist before 1900 move 25 million passengers around the world every year.
Along with those transportation options available for society, we also have billions of vehicle trips to and from airports, hotels, ports, and amusement parks that are increasing each year. COVID-19 has shown us that society changes can reduce the demand of those growing numbers.
Yes, we may be using fossil fuels too extensively for leisure and entertainment but the developed world is where it is today, healthier and wealthier, because of all those products we get from those oil derivatives.
To meet those low emission targets, we’ll need to continue to reduce the transportation demands of society and COVID-19 may be showing us how we’ll need to retract from our extravagant usage of the various transportation systems that did not exist before fossil fuels.
Our future existence may be less vacations and less business conferences. Reductions in the usage of the entertainment and hospitality industries, neither of which existed before fossil fuels, may also be necessitated.
As we wean ourselves from oil, we’ll need to lower our demands for transportation infrastructures that COVID-19 has shown us the way.
As we wean ourselves away from fossil fuels, we’ll need to accept that developing countries like many in China, India, and Africa are still stuck in the pre-1900’s era. They have yet to join the industrial revolution and the opportunity to enjoy the thousands of products in our daily lifestyles. Of which may never do so as the fuels that support the demands of the various transportation infrastructures will be diminishing.
The same politicians that are thrashing on the oil and gas industry, and seeking its demise, are the same ones reaping the benefits of the medications, medical equipment, communication networks, and the thousands of other products. This from industries that have contributed to their lifestyles and their ability to live beyond 80 years of age. Those vocal about emissions need to join the conservation movement.
Yes the world has changed from the societies that existed in primeval times, without airlines, trains, vehicles, merchant ships, medications, fertilizers, cosmetics, and military equipment like aircraft carriers, battleships, planes, tanks and armor, trucks, troop carriers, and weaponry, and electricity that did not exist before 1900, but now may be the time to start showing our conservation cards.
At a rapid pace more and more countries and governments are moving their energy policies toward ridding the world of fossil fuels to electrify societies using only intermittent electricity from wind turbines and solar panels. Electricity alone may support a simplified lifestyle but cannot support the huge energy needs of the transportation infrastructures, nor provide the thousands of products that societies demand from those petroleum derivatives.
Ron Stein contributes Posts at the CFACT site. He is an engineer who, drawing upon 25 years of project management and business development experience, launched Principal Technical Services (PTS) in 1995. He writes frequently on issues of energy and economics.
Read more excellent articles at CFACT http://www.cfact.org/
Social Changes With COVID-19 Are A Prelude To Life With Less Fossil Fuels | PA Pundits – International
SEE also :
- UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity And The Environment | Climatism
- TEAM GRETA Admits Climate Change Has Nothing To Do With The Environment | Climatism
- 46 STATEMENTS By IPCC Experts Against The IPCC | Climatism
- DRACONIAN UN CLIMATE AGENDA EXPOSED : ‘Global Warming Fears Are A Tool For Political and Economic Change…It Has Nothing To Do With The Actual Climate’ | Climatism
U.N. Agenda 21 / 2030 related :
THE Climatism Tip Jar – Support The Fight Against Dangerous, Costly and Unscientific Climate Alarm
(Climate sceptics/rationalists still waitin’ for that “big oil” cheque to arrive in the mail!)
Help us to hit back against the bombardment of climate lies costing our communities, economies and livelihoods far, far too much.
Thanks to all those who have donated. Your support and faith in Climatism is highly motivating and greatly appreciated!
Citizen journalists can’t rely on mastheads, rather private donations and honest content. Every pledge helps, heaps!
Click link for more info…
Many thanks, Jamie.
(NB// The PayPal account linked to “Climatism” is “Five-O-Vintage”)
6 Comments on “COVID-19 : A Prelude To Life Under The ‘Net Zero 2050’ Policy”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Great stuff Author: Jamie Spry. Apologies for sending you so much stuff you blocked me. Alan G. Hider
[…] COVID-19 : A Prelude To Life Under The ‘Net Zero 2050’ Policy […]
“THIS is the age of morality, where it’s more important to signal virtue than sense and reason.” Isn’t it the truth!? The COVID-19 pandemic is the perfect example of a world without fossil fuels; broken economy, no healthcare, limited energy, no future potential. A world without hope… And eco-activists would LOVE for us to reach for that goal! What utter nonsense!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well put Brian. Either that or they’re just so naive they actually believe this blatant cover up for the UN’s Socialist NWO agenda is really about saving us from being infected by a relatively mild virus pandemic. Even the common cold can and does kill some vulnerable individuals, when it develops into pneumonia and like this one, it also has no cure, nor a vaccine. IOW: we’ve survived much worse pandemics in the past and there was never a need for rolling out global totalitarian socialist controls that were forced upon us with this COVID-19 storm in a teacup.
It’s just mind numbing how so many people accept this police state without question, when they have unwittingly relinquished their freedoms to the same enemy that took our fathers and grandfathers two world wars to ensure we wouldn’t lose!
Here’s the truth and there are many more propagating the same message, which the MSM are forbidden by the UN and their complicit member governments, (including Australia’s) to even look at, let alone publish.
This is just the tip of the Orwellian iceberg and things are set to become very messy in the immediate future.
Nobody, not even devout TDS suffering leftists will accept this evil manipulation and trickery performed by the non-elected, undemocratic oligarchs in the authoritarian UN; once they realize just how easily they allowed themselves to be totally duped and hoodwinked by these humanity loathing Malthusians into irreversibly ruining their lives.
They should have seen the bright red flags when they started ramping up the demonstrably false ‘climate crisis’ hysteria, particularly noticeable post Nov 2016, (when Donald Trump became POTUS).
A global scale violent revolt will most surely follow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, and the UN, Greta and her ilk / managers would have us believe this is the utopia of the future. What a pile of bullshit!
To paraphrase Greta, “How Dare They!”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d go a step further and dare suggest that certain UN oligarchs write Saint Greta’s rants for her including the “How dare you conclusion”.
It’s all for show.and she is the stupid indoctrinated puppet her ilk hide behind and use as their mouth piece to propagate their lies for them. How cowardly – they think everyone will be tolerant and forgiving, knowing she’s just a terrified little kid and the ‘deniers’ won’t dare criticise a kid.
Well they were quite wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person