Nets Ignore 300+ Scientists’ Petition To Withdraw From UN Climate ConventionPosted: March 2, 2017
“The liberal media love to report on climate change so long as the story affirms an alarmist, man-caused climate change narrative. When scientists question that, the media fall silent.”
Great quote. And the reasoning behind the media silence is simple: Questioning the preferred (groupthink) wisdom of the day is considered heresy. Especially when “saving the planet” is the dominant virtue-signalling theme of the era we currently inhabit.
After all, who wants to kill Bambi?
By Aly Nielsen~
The liberal media love to report on climate change so long as the story affirms an alarmist, man-caused climate change narrative. When scientists question that, the media fall silent.
More than 300 scientists, engineers and meteorologists, led by MIT Meteorology professor Dr. Richard Lindzen, signed a petition asking President Trump to “withdraw from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)” on Feb. 23, 2017. But ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows never once mentioned the letter between Feb. 23 and March 1.
The Hill columnist Timothy Cama said “the signers of the Thursday letter differ slightly on their exact problems with mainstream climate science,” but were unified that the U.S. should withdraw from the climate convention.
“We support reasonable and cost-effective environmental protection,” Lindzen’s petition read, “But carbon dioxide, the target of the UNFCCC is not a pollutant but a major benefit…
View original post 238 more words