Climategate 2: Heating Data Exaggerated By NOAA

In 1960, Eisenhower foresaw the possibility of a criminal like Tom Karl of NOAA corrupting science….

“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocation, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet in holding scientific discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
– President Eisenhower  1960

PA Pundits - International

Bolt New 01By Andrew Bolt ~

Another Climategate? Now a whistleblower says the world’s leading source of climate data  exaggerated global warming to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The NOAA allegedly fiddled data to falsely claim there was no ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming since 1998.

noaaflaweddataDavid Rose of the Mail on Sunday:

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by…

View original post 746 more words

Advertisements

4 Comments on “Climategate 2: Heating Data Exaggerated By NOAA”

  1. Mike Haseler says:

    Like so many scandals, it’s not the initial wrongdoing but the coverup that brings them down. And as such, whilst the FakeScience is outrageous, the clearly criminal behaviour came when NOAA refused to comply with the lawful subpoena from its oversight committee (something most people seem to have lost site of).

    That criminal behaviour by NOAA was clearly not only criminal but politically motived in the run up to the US election. So, now we have criminality, high politics … and questions such as “how far up the chain of command did the conspiracy to break the law go”. My hunch is that somewhere there is a smoking gun taking it right to the desk of Obama.

    I think you can see where I’m going with this … whilst sceptics & alarmists are in heated debate about a graph or whether there’s been warming … the real story is elsewhere.

    And like Climategate before, the internet is overheated by coverage – but less than a handful of the big Old Mainstream Media have coverage as yet.

    And this will be because they simply do not realise the rules of the game have changed. Last year, a story like this could be squashed … because the administration would just go into full denial mode.

    This year …

    Liked by 1 person

    • Climatism says:

      Agree 110%.
      The real scandal and problem lies with the fact that a literal handful of climate agency heads are the gatekeepers of climate data, most importantly temp data: NASA, NOAA, Met, CSIRO, BoM. So, one can almost forgive the mainstream media for cultivating hysteria because these aforementioned activist agencies provide the media, public and the worlds scientists with bogus/cooked data.
      Therefore the 97% meme almost has merit in that 97% of literally 5-10 gatekeepers disseminate the fraudulent data leading to 97% of scientists, media, pollies and public believing them verbatim. Why wouldn’t you?
      NOAA (Tom Karl) refusing to handover methodology and ‘public’ data, pertaining to temp homogenisation, in Senate hearings is criminal beyond reproach.
      It’s no wonder he ‘resigned’ shortly after.
      But superb that his “pause buster” Karl et al paper has been outed by NOAA whistleblower.
      Tom Karl, get to Mexico before that walls built buddy.

      Like

  2. […] Homewood, of the excellent climate blog NALOPKT, notes that NOAA has not bothered to update Tornado data for 2015/16. “Could it be they would rather the […]

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s