Climate alarmist dud-prediction update…
The recent onslaught of rain and snow finally brought much-needed relief to northern California, ending a punishing five-year drought, federal officials said Thursday.
“Bye bye drought … Don’t let the door hit you on the way out,” tweeted the National Weather Service’s office in Reno, Nev., which monitors parts of the region.
View original post 276 more words
Malicious Torture: Macarthur Wind Farm Neigbours Continue to Suffer, as AGL Dodges Damning Acoustic EvidencePosted: January 14, 2017
Shame on you AGL – subsidy sucking corporatist vampires. Your product “wind power” does not even work. And you have destroyed a great family product – Annie Gardner’s world prized Marino wool that did WORK! Until your wind monstrosities ruined their existence and the Gardners’. Shame on you and your filthy industrial feel-good un-green windmill boondoggles.
You are not alone Annie Gardner. Fight on.
The incessant turbine generated low-frequency noise and infrasound from AGL’s Macarthur wind farm in western Victoria has been driving neighbours nuts or out of their homes since December 2012.
Having been lied to and bullied for just as long, one of AGL’s victims (and an STT Champion) Annie Gardner let rip with this stinging rebuke, published in their local rag.
What does AGL have to hide regarding the Macarthur Wind Project?
7 January 2017
For over two years now I have been requesting AGL engage Steven Cooper of The Acoustic Group in Sydney (who carried out the Cape Bridgewater wind farm study) to undertake full spectrum noise testing at our property and others around the Macarthur Wind Farm, along with concurrent personal health monitoring, to determine once and for all what is causing so many people ongoing pain and suffering as a result of proximity to…
View original post 716 more words
“Peer review has turned into “pal review” due to the small population of qualified researchers in climate, and many of the same lessons taught by an exercise in taunting the peer review process in 1996 are germane to the publication of climate science today, where there seems to be an air of “anything goes as long as it goes with our thinking”
“Pal-Review” – the reason why you will ONLY read climate studies that are sympathetic to “man-made” climate effects caused by “man-made” CO2. This is the dangerous corruption of science where a handful of activist academics decide what is published and what is not.
It’s no wonder climate “scientists” preface their studies with “anthropogenic”, because otherwise their studies are rejected and funding rejected. At worst they are sacked or vilified for not attributing climate changes directly with ‘evil’ mankind.
Note to readers: This Sunday column by George Will appeared in my local newspaper this week, and I thought it relevant to repeat the headline and excerpts of it here, because what Will discusses is relevant to the fractured state of climate science. Peer review has turned into “pal review” due to the small population of qualified researchers in climate, and many of the same lessons taught by an exercise in taunting the peer review process in 1996 are germane to the publication of climate science today, where there seems to be an air of “anything goes as long as it goes with our thinking”. On the opposite side, we have garbage papers accepted by people who transposed their names to get past what they feared would be gatekeeping.
Publishing a paper in a peer reviewed journal is by no means a guarantee of accuracy. Just look what happened…
View original post 629 more words