‘Intellectual yet idiotic’: the sad case of Stephan Lewandowsky

Another attempt by the CAGW alarmist elite to shut down debate and intimidate through name-calling and ‘othering’ those who dare dissent to their preferred climate wisdom. Classic ad-hominem tactics used by the intolerant and totalitarian Left in order to protect their self-serving, ideological agenda of the day.

When you hear such “don’t listen to any opposing views”, you know you’re listening to a con.

Furthermore Stephan, “belief” and “denial” are the words of zealots not scientists.

Watts Up With That?

Guest opinion by Drieu Godefridi

In a new paper just published with two other authors “The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism“, Stephan Lewandowsky states — for the umpteenth time — that climate skeptics are deniers, that

“there is strong evidence that the rejection of climate science is primarily driven by ideological factors”

(page 2), even psychological factors since their identity (page 3), or worldview, is threatened by climate science, that

“there is growing evidence for an involvement of conspiracist ideation in the rejection of climate science”

(page 4) and that the whole body of skeptical pseudo-science (pp. 4, 15, 16) is incoherent, thus implying a form of “Mad Hatter” nonsense, since he claims that coherence is at the very essence of science.

Mr. Lewandowsky commits errors in reasoning that should have him immediately stripped of his university affiliation.

First…

View original post 865 more words

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s