Is Stupidity The Main Driver Of Global Warming?

Real Science

The Washington Post says that DC snow is now caused by global warming.

Screenshot 2016-02-03 at 12.17.49 PMScreenshot 2016-02-03 at 12.18.01 PM

Is global warming behind D.C.’s new era of great snowstorms?

Four years ago, the same clowns were predicting cherry blossoms in February, due to global warming.

Screenshot 2016-02-03 at 12.25.59 PMScreenshot 2016-02-03 at 12.25.50 PM

Could cherry blossoms one day be blooming in winter?

Snowfall around DC is not changing. Climate science is 100% superstition and data tampering.

Screenshot 2016-02-03 at 12.44.49 PM

View original post

Aussie CSIRO: Massive cuts to Government Climate Jobs

Hopefully, through government funding cuts and a shift to a commercial model, the only “climate [that] will be all gone…” is the climate of global warming alarmism and fear mongering.

For too long, so many of our most revered scientific and learning institutions have become the breeding grounds for the great global warming scare – cultivated by ideology and activism, and nourished by an unlimited diet of unregulated taxpayer billions.

With ‘environmentalists’ in control of our institutions, a culture of one-way science has been allowed to flourish through the forces of ‘monopolistic funding’, whereby government money is directed into “man-made” global warming research, whilst studies and funding into “natural” climate change are non-existent.

This oneway flow of money ultimately skews and distorts the science that is output.

Joanne Nova notes, a “lack of funding for alternatives leaves a vacuum and creates a systemic failure. The force of monopolistic funding works like a ratchet mechanism on science. Results can move in both directions, but the funding means that only results from one side of the equation get “traction.”

The systemic failure self-perpetuates :

* Where’s the motivation in proving anthropogenic global warming wrong?
* How serious are they about getting the data right? Or are they only serious about getting the “right” data?
* “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair, 1935

The oneway flow of government funding leads not only to an unhealthy distortion of science, but also to an unhealthy bias in the scientific and media reporting we receive on climate change.

Watts Up With That?


Guest essay by Eric Worrall

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that 350 research jobs are to be cut at the government CSIRO.

Climate science to be gutted as CSIRO swings jobs axe

Fears that some of Australia’s most important climate research institutions will be gutted under a Turnbull government have been realised with deep job cuts for scientists to be announced to staff later today.

Fairfax Media has learnt that as many as 110 positions in the Oceans and Atmosphere division will go, with a similarly sharp reduction in the Land and Water division.

Total job cuts would be about 350 staff over two years, the CSIRO confirmed in an email to staff, with the Data61 and Manufacturing divisions also hit.

The cuts were flagged in November, just a week before the Paris climate summit began, with key divisions told to prepare lists of job cuts or to find new…

View original post 79 more words

Reduce Global CO2, or all the Cuddly Koala Bears will Die

She won’t have to look hard with her $5 million dollars of tax payer funds to find a koala to study, with Australia undergoing ‘culling’ programs to reduce, not declining but soaring numbers…

Watts Up With That?

"Koala climbing tree" by Diliff - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons.Koala climbing tree” by DiliffOwn work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons.

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

A professor has received a $5 million grant, to investigate whether rising CO2 and predicted endless drought will make the Koala’s Eucalyptus leaf diet too toxic for them to eat.

… The koala could soon be even more endangered than at present, if it turns out that climate change alters the nutritional value of the only food it can eat—Eucalypt leaves. Assistant Professor Elizabeth Neilson from the Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences from University of Copenhagen has received a $5 million grant from the Villum Young Investigator Program for the search of how the chemical structure of the leaves is disrupted.

“We are going to investigate how two distinct results of climate change, drought and elevated CO2 levels, affect the balance between nutrient and toxicant…

View original post 286 more words