Climate Change: The Burden of ProofPosted: February 2, 2016
Don’t have to search far to find hard evidence of the climate scam in action. One of the more glaring examples being the IPCC’s ACC certainly levels *increasing*, as the divergence between climate models and observed reality, also increases!
Good summary by Singer.
By Paul Homewood
Reposted from American Thinker:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has to provide proof for significant human-caused climate change; yet their climate models have never been validated and are rapidly diverging from actual observations. The real threat to humanity comes not from any (trivial) greenhouse warming but from cooling periods creating food shortages and famines.
Climate change has been going on for millions of years — long before humans existed on this planet. Obviously, the causes were all of natural origin and not anthropogenic. There is no reason to think that these natural causes have suddenly stopped. For example, volcanic eruptions, various types of solar influences, and atmosphere-ocean oscillations all continue today. We cannot model these natural climate-forcings precisely and therefore cannot anticipate what they will be in the future.
But let’s call this the “Null hypothesis.” Logically therefore, the burden of proof falls upon…
View original post 279 more words