Analysis: depending on wind and solar energy sources is seriously misguided

The misguided and reckless use of literally trillions of dollars of other people’s (taxpayers) money to fight ‘global warming’ that is now called ‘climate change’ to cover hot or cold is the real travesty of this age of collective environmental madness.

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Solar power tower, Spain [image credit: Network] Solar power tower, Spain [image credit: Network]
Energy blog Master Resource analyses the future of world energy generation. Several scenarios are considered, but the bottom line is that the the idea of renewables as a primary energy source can never be made to work.

Wind, Solar Mirage

Regarding the power market, wind and solar will actually play a minor, even inconsequential, role in reducing emissions by 2035. Worse still for those that believe human-caused CO2 emission are responsible for disastrous climate change, other reasonable options now available will not have a timely effect.

Adaptation, and using wealth diverted from inappropriate energy policy, is a key public-policy takeaway from this series.

View original post 109 more words

Are 97% Of Scientists Complete Morons?

We live in a ‘1984’ world where “saving the planet” means far more than the effect one molecule has amongst the other ten thousand.

Real Science

Atmospheric CO2 has risen by 100 parts per million (one part per ten thousand) over the past century. That is equivalent to packing one extra person into this Bernie “everything will be free” Sanders rally.

ScreenHunter_51 Oct. 16 12.26

Experts claim that this one molecule has heated the other 10,000 molecules up by more than one degree centigrade.

In order for one molecule to heat up 10,000 other molecules by 1°C, the effective temperature of that one molecule would have to be 10,000°C – about twice the temperature of the surface of the Sun.

Only a complete moron would believe something so ludicrous, which is why they say 97% of scientists agree on this utter nonsense.

View original post

Another Smoking Gun Of Temperature Fraud At NASA

“In 1999, NASA’s James Hansen wrote that the US was cooling, even as greenhouse gases rapidly increased.”

Hansen was spot on, until the ‘global warming’ agenda deemed cooling ‘inconvenient’…

Real Science

In 1999, NASA’s James Hansen wrote that the US was cooling, even as greenhouse gases rapidly increased.

ScreenHunter_46 Oct. 16 08.37

Science Briefs
Whither U.S. Climate?
By James Hansen

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country (Figure 2).

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

The US has (by far) the most credible temperature record in the world, so this cooling was devastating to their global warming theory. NASA responded to this challenge as they always do, by tampering with the data and making the cooling disappear.

GISSUS1999vs20151999 version: 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
2015 version: Fig.D.gif (525×438)

View original post