Climate Scientists Question Significance Of Obama’s New Carbon Rule

Spot on.
How much pain, for what gain?
Climate catastrophests can never tell us by how much will the temperature of the globe change with their trillion dollar green fantasies.

PA Pundits - International

Anderson_Alex_lo1By Alex Anderson ~

Days after the Obama administration finalized plans to reduce carbon emissions, some climate scientists have criticized the administration for failing to detail how the regulations will lower global temperatures.

EPACritics Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy (C) introduces US President Barack Obama (not pictured) in the East Room of the White House in Washington DC, USA, 03 August 2015. (Newscom/EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS)

These critics suggest the administration used the plan more to inspire global climate action, rather than using it as a concrete step to make the earth cooler.

On Monday, the Obama administration finalized the Clean Power Plan, which would overhaul America’s energy system by striving to reduce carbon emissions from power plants 32 percent by 2030.

Chip Knappenberger, assistant director at the Cato Institute, argues that if the administration’s plan was implemented to perfection, the amount of climate change averted would amount to insignificant levels.

View original post 463 more words

Climate Clown Of The Day

To have a genuine loud outburst of laughter in the all-too-often climate grind.
This wins for me so far this year!

Good one!

But sadly this is the level of religious belief invoked by the eco-brainwashed, that mankind can actually reverse sea level rise, going on for 20,000 years and change the climate, that’s been changing for 4.5 billion years.

Amazing stuff.

Real Science

ScreenHunter_2660 Aug. 05 17.13

View original post

Professor Ross McKitrick: Wind turbines don’t run on wind, they run on subsidies.

Professor Ross McKitrick, who cracked the Michael Mann-made Hockeystick fraud, now helping crack the resulting Industrial Wind-Farm fraud!



As STT followers are acutely aware, wind power is an economic and environmental fraud. Because wind power can only ever be delivered at crazy, random intervals – and, therefore, never “on-demand” – it will never be a substitute for those generation sources which are – ie hydro, nuclear, gas and coal (see our posts here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here).

Were it not for government mandates – backed by a constant and colossal stream of subsidies (see our post here) – wind power generators would never dispatch a single spark to the grid, as they would never find a customer that would accept power delivered 30% of the time (at best) on terms where the vendor can never tell customers just when that power might be delivered – if at all (see our post here).

Ultimately, it’ll be…

View original post 1,442 more words

Eastern Arctic Sea Ice Extent Highest In 20 Years

Being part of the green faith means you are morally virtuous and therefore on the right side of the debate. No need to worry about warping the truth, lying or cheating, when it’s all for a ‘good cause’.

The Guardian’s queen bee climate criminal *Suzanne Goldenberg* knows how the game is played …

Meanwhile nature lands another heavy blow to the cult with the rapid growth (not loss) of Eastern Arctic sea ice. Ouch.

Real Science

The amount of sea ice in the eastern Arctic has rapidly increased over the past four years, and is higher than it was 30 years ago in 1985.


Product – Product Search – Canadian Ice Service

Meanwhile, the usual criminals in the press claim the exact opposite.

ScreenHunter_268 Aug. 05 05.07

Polar bear numbers in Hudson Bay of Canada on verge of collapse | Environment | The Guardian

An easy way of identifying a climate criminal, is that they never correct any of their claims, and simply double down with their lies and fraud.

View original post