“We Live In The Coldest Period Of The Last 10.000 Years"
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Climate Change, Climate Changes, Climate History, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Global Cooling, Global Warming, Greenland, Medieval Warm Period Leave a comment
By Paul Homewood
Jørgen Peder Steffensen is an Associate Professor at the University of Copenhagen and one of the world’s leading experts on ice cores. Using ice cores from sites in Greenland, he has been able to reconstruct temperatures there for the last 10000 years. So what are his conclusions?
- Temperatures in Greenland were about 1.5 C warmer 1000 years ago than now.
- It was perhaps 2.5 C warmer 4000 years ago.
- The period around 1875, at the lowest point of the Little Ice Age, marked the coldest point in the last 10,000 years.
- Other evidence from elsewhere in the Northern Hemisphere confirms this picture.
His final comment is particularly telling :-
I agree totally we have had a global temperature increase in the 20thC – but an increase from what? ..Probably an increase from the lowest point in the last 10,000 years.
We started to…
View original post 40 more words
Gore Takes $500 Million From Oil Billionaires, Then Calls For Everyone Else To Give Up Their Big Oil Money
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Uncategorized 1 Comment
Gore also expressed support for the divestment movement that has been growing in popularity on college campuses in the U.S., referring to investment in fossil fuels as a “carbon bubble.” The movement contends that investing in fossil fuels is a moral hazard but will become a financial hazard, too, when there is a global price on carbon emissions.
Al Gore Draws Parallels Between Budget Crisis And Climate Change Denial
1975 Shock News : Global Cooling And Increasing Arctic Ice Causes Tornadoes And Droughts
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Carbon Dioxide, Climate Alarmism, Climate Change, Climate Changes, Climate History, Global Cooling, Global Warming, Govt Climate Agenda, Science Leave a commentClimatism comment :
Global Warming Theory ~ Circular reasoning at its best | CACA
Scientists are much smarter now, and know that tornadoes, droughts and increasing Arctic ice are all caused by declining Arctic ice.
Shock News : Wind turbines would need to cover Wales to supply 17% of UK energy needs
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Carbon Dioxide, Climate Alarmism, Climatism, Failed Green Schemes, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Renewables, Wind Farms | Tags: Eco-Madness, UK, Wales, Wind Farms Leave a comment“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the
equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
– Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
“A total population of 250-300 million people,
a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
– Ted Turner,
founder of CNN and major UN donor
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty,
reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
– Professor Maurice King
•••
Wind turbines would need to cover Wales to supply a sixth of country’s energy needs
AN area the size of Wales would need to be covered in wind turbines to meet just a sixth of the nation’s daily energy needs, according to a new study that has cast doubt over the Government’s push for wind energy.
By analysing the average power output possible from wind turbines and comparing it to the amount of land needed to house each turbine, Professor MacKay believes wind farms will need at least five times more land than has been previously estimated.
His research has raised further doubts over the viability of the Government’s push for wind power.
Critics insist that wind energy is too unreliable to replace the creaking network of fossil fuel power stations and would require an extensive network of back up power stations to provide energy on calm days.
Wind farms have also faced intense opposition from rural campaigners who say the huge turbines, which can be up to 400 feet tall, are spoiling the countryside and pose a risk to wildlife.
Wind turbines would need to cover Wales to supply a sixth of country’s energy needs – Telegraph
If Greens love nature, why aren’t they more concerned about carpeting unspoilt, pristine landscapes with bat-chomping, bird-slicing, [industrial] eco crucifixes….?
•••
Related Articles :
- PEER REVIEW : Lessons in wasting money: Use more wind and solar and… emit just as much CO2 « JoNova
- The dirty secret of Britain’s power madness: Polluting diesel generators built in secret by foreign companies to kick in when there’s no wind for turbines – and other insane but true eco-scandals
- Wind farms vs wildlife : The shocking environmental cost of renewable energy » The Spectator
- Wind farms — are 96% useless, and cost 150 times more than necessary for what they do « JoNova
Climatism Related :
- A Token Gesture To The Folly Of Green Madness | CACA
- Shock News : Promoters overstated environmental benefit of wind farms | CACA
- Bananas deadlier than Fukushima | CACA
- Europe’s Green Energy Basket Case Is Barack Obama’s Dream | CACA
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago| CACA
- UTTER INSANITY: Spending $160b to cut the temperature by 0.00005 degrees | CACA
Quote source : The Green Agenda
Shock News : Promoters overstated environmental benefit of wind farms
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Alarmism uncovered, Carbon Dioxide, Climatism, Fact Check, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Renewables, Wind Farms 1 Comment“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another
United States. We can’t let other countries have the same
number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US.
We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
– Michael Oppenheimer,
Environmental Defense Fund
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the
industrialized civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong,
founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
•••
Promoters overstated the environmental benefit of wind farms
The wind farm industry has been forced to admit that the environmental benefit of wind power in reducing carbon emissions is only half as big as it had previously claimed.
The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) has agreed to scale down its calculation for the amount of harmful carbon dioxide emission that can be eliminated by using wind turbines to generate electricity instead of burning fossil fuels such as coal or gas.
Experts have previously calculated that to help achieve the Government’s aim of saving around 200 million tons of CO2 emissions by 2020 – through generating 15 per cent of the country’s electricity from wind power – would require 50,000 wind turbines.
But the new figure for carbon displacement means that twice as many turbines would now be needed to save the same amount of CO2 emissions.
While their advocates regard wind farms as a key part of Britain’s fight against climate change, opponents argue they blight the landscape at great financial cost while bringing little environmental benefit.
Promoters overstated the environmental benefit of wind farms – Telegraph
Related Articles :
- PEER REVIEW : Lessons in wasting money: Use more wind and solar and… emit just as much CO2 « JoNova
- The dirty secret of Britain’s power madness: Polluting diesel generators built in secret by foreign companies to kick in when there’s no wind for turbines – and other insane but true eco-scandals
- Wind farms vs wildlife : The shocking environmental cost of renewable energy » The Spectator
- Wind farms — are 96% useless, and cost 150 times more than necessary for what they do « JoNova
Climatism Related :
- A Token Gesture To The Folly Of Green Madness | CACA
- Bananas deadlier than Fukushima | CACA
- Europe’s Green Energy Basket Case Is Barack Obama’s Dream | CACA
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago| CACA
- UTTER INSANITY: Spending $160b to cut the temperature by 0.00005 degrees | CACA
Understanding How The Missing Heat Causes Climate Change
Posted: October 19, 2013 Filed under: Climate Change, Hot Spot, Oceans, Pseudo-Science Leave a commentThere has been no atmospheric warming for 17 years, because 2.4 billion nuclear bombs worth of heat is hiding in the bottom of the ocean.
This heat at the bottom of the ocean is affecting atmospheric physics through a mysterious mechanism, which actually doesn’t involve any change in heat content of the atmosphere.
The symptoms of this are known as climate change, which has caused all sorts of highly educated people to remark that they don’t remember any windy, hot or rainy days prior to a few months ago.
Climatism 
Recent Comments