Mike Hulme: Nuccitelli “97% consensus article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed”Posted: July 25, 2013
Eco-alarmist Dana Nuccitelli’s “97% consensus” study – a failed marketing ploy to bolster a failing CAGW theory. A divisive disgrace and another blow to the integrity of science.
From Warren Pearce’s posting of Ben Pile’s excellent article at ‘Making Science Public‘
Mike Hulme July 25, 2013 at 6:39 am
Ben Pile is spot on. The “97% consensus” article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed. It obscures the complexities of the climate issue and it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country that the energy minister should cite it.
View original post 316 more words